He has details facts about human body, animals and about mother nature that he can use to support his idea of not using so much light at night and how we need darkness. What do you notice about these four short sentences? Well, compare the following: According to the United States Department of Education, closing down the school will displace hundreds of young children who have only just begun to forge friendships; additionally many local residents employed by the school might be forced to move from the area.
Bogard then concludes his argument that darkness is essential to human well-being by analyzing sleep.
The writer also sees the connection between darkness as a source of solitude and it inspiring countless numbers of philosophers, artists, and stargazers for millennia. The essay will lack any overarching point. We know of no cases where admission committees will make formulaic use of essay scores.
The response also includes an generally effective conclusion that summarizes rather than advances the essay Paul Bogard supports the preservation of natural darkness.
However, the writer does not elaborate on this point. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to that question. The second, by contrast, tugs at your heartstrings the poor children!
Pathos We are not robots; we are moved by passionate appeals. By asking this question, Bogard draws out heartfelt ponderance from his readers about the affecting power of an untainted night sky.